The bibliographic description has become a crucial issue for obtaining information and its sources in the era of information, knowledge and wisdom, "and radical changes have been witnessed in the past few years in the standards of indexing, and the bibliographic description and its codification are no longer an individual work, but rather set off to the horizons of international institutional work; and we encounter this not only as a matter of application, but - mainly - as a matter of theorizing, crippling and framing based on the international standardization of the bibliographic description [cabbing] ISBD, representative of the laws that keep pace with the electronic and digital era. Catalogers are able to deal with a different type of cultural material, through the guide for this standardization, which includes the nine main elements and their precise details, a chapter on the types of bibliographic records and the materials that are described, and the relationship of the standard with the standard of other metadata, along with models that explain how to apply it. This criterion is unified in several fields, such as reliance on authority lists and flexibility, which allows the entity conducting indexing operations to adjust its policies according to its needs and the needs of its beneficiaries.
Helal, N. H. A. E. (2023). Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO): A theoretical introduction. Arab International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(4), 81-104. doi: 10.21608/aikm.2023.231697.1052
MLA
Nawal Helal Abd elghany Helal. "Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO): A theoretical introduction", Arab International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2, 4, 2023, 81-104. doi: 10.21608/aikm.2023.231697.1052
HARVARD
Helal, N. H. A. E. (2023). 'Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO): A theoretical introduction', Arab International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(4), pp. 81-104. doi: 10.21608/aikm.2023.231697.1052
VANCOUVER
Helal, N. H. A. E. Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO): A theoretical introduction. Arab International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2023; 2(4): 81-104. doi: 10.21608/aikm.2023.231697.1052